Exclusive: FDA releases hundreds of dog DCM case reports via FOIA
This afternoon, The Canine Review received records by email responding to a Freedom of Information Act request we filed earlier […]
This afternoon, The Canine Review received records by email responding to a Freedom of Information Act request we filed earlier […]
From The Chatfield Show YouTube Page: “In this episode, our hosts (Dr. Jen the vet and Dr. Jason Chatfield) sit […]
The Canine Review asks Embrace’s leaders to disclose the dollar amount in legal fees so far that this litigation is costing, a cost ultimately born out by Embrace’s policy holders through higher premiums.
America’s second largest provider of pet insurance, Seattle-based Trupanion, confirmed earlier this week that the company is now blocking The Canine Review’s domain name. Many academic and company servers filter pornographic content and, of course, there are other historic examples such as Instant Messenger, the messaging application, and online games such as Snood; all were regularly blocked by company and academic servers. But no other U.S.-based company we’re aware of has ever blocked a news organization.
“If there’s anything material about the company that occurred prior to us letting these three people go,” Mr. Rawlings said, “we would’ve had to report that before [the dismissals]. There’s nothing material,” he said emphatically. “What we did have is a communication challenge in that people read the information and they inferred some stuff that we did not make as clear as we should have….There is language in our [SEC filing] that actually describes that we didn’t have any material issues with any of [the three ousted executives]. There wasn’t any malfeasance. We thought that that was going to be enough. We should have been more explicit.”
The Seattle-based provider of medical insurance for dogs and cats announced the departures of three of its senior officers early […]
After USA Today reported, falsely, that Elanco had covered up adverse event reports and withheld them from regulators, rather than issue a correction, Mr. Hettinger and USA Today simply deleted the story’s most significant paragraph. In fact, there was even a “Why This Story Matters” graphic, also removed.
It was an egregious enough violation of the company’s own corrections policy to warrant an FYI to Newsguard, a fact-checking company. Fortunately for Gannett, this reporter’s father is Newsguard’s co-CEO- -and because of that, Newsguard determined that the risk for perception of conflict outweighed the need for them to downgrade Gannett’s rating, at least for now. However, TCR’s reporting shows what now amounts to more than two years of egregious violations of the most basic journalism standards. Note: This is a great newstip for a media reporter.
On March 22, the U.S. Supreme Court began hearing oral arguments in a case centered around a rubber dog toy […]
The American Kennel Club is the world’s largest purebred dog registry. This week, the organization announced that according to its […]
The FDA announced on Friday, March 10 that the distributor Stratford Care USA, Inc. is recalling Omega-3 supplements for cats […]